JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 20, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Mauricio Zapata Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil y Agraria, para que defina cuál de los dos juzgados de Familia es competente para conocer de la tutela instaurada por el accionante de la referencia contra el Ministerio de Educación Nacional.

Por lo anterior, la Corte reiteró que los conflictos de competencia que se susciten en materia de tutela deben ser resueltos por el superior jerárquico común a los jueces o tribunales respectivos.

Esta Corporación sólo puede dirimir aquellos conflictos que no puedan resolverse dentro de las respectivas estructuras jurisdiccionales de origen.

Para el presente caso, por tratarse de dos juzgados de Familia que pertenecen a distritos judiciales diversos es la mencionada Sala el superior jerárquico común competente para dirimir la controversia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITASE el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil y Agraria, para que ella defina cuál de los dos juzgados de Familia es competente para conocer de la acción de tutela incoada por MAURICIO ZAPATA MUÑOZ contra el Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.